Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Building the new 3D printer

It's been awhile since I've updated this blog, but I try to do it when i'm venturing into new territories, even through I've failed with the last one..

I built a huge RepRap, which I barely documented. It is big, and mostly works, kinda, but it's neat to look at.



Now I'm working on something else, which is a lot bigger, and hopefully a lot more stable.

I've decided to go with a CoreXY design, which is pretty interesting in that it uses two belts to drive an X and Y axis, but by working together.
Now, I'm not the first one to build something like this, it's nothing new. However, i'm doing what I did before, and building it really big. This thing will hopefully have a 2' cubed printable area. I'm not 100% on that, but it's what I'm shooting for.

So far I've gotten the frame built up and some V-slot cut to handle the rails, but I'm going to start blogging about what I'm doing here and why, since there's so little information on CoreXY design out there.

Anyway, a quick picture on where I'm at right now:


Monday, January 23, 2012

Falcon Project

Sorry for the lack of updates here, folks. I've been very busy with a project which is big enough to have it's own blog, restoring my Mutoh Falcon Outdoor 48. I'll update this with interesting projects from time to time, but for now, my main focus is getting this thing working.

Check out all the posts and tons of photos over at http://falconoutdoor.blogspot.com

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Battling tftpd

*Update!* If you are using this to actually host configs for IP phones that will be used on a live network, I strongly suggest using atftpd instead.
Atftp does not have these odd file permission issues that plain tftpd does (i.e. once a file is created (such as a log file from a phone) by tftpd, it cannot be overwritten for some crazy reason.) Most IP phones store their configurations on the server, and if they cannot write them down after the first time, users (and you!) will not be happy!


Alright so this new job has got me documenting everything the minute I do it, so that I know what the hell to do the next time something happens.

So, this time? It's something I'm doing for myself.

Installing at tftp server in Ubuntu.

I know it sounds stupid, but every tutorial is from 2005 and none of them work on the current version of Ubuntu nowadays. If you want a working tftp server, here's how you do it:

Install the tftpd program. This will also install xinetd, which is how it's started. inetd starts xinetd, who then starts tftpd. I know, dumb, but that's how it works.

$ sudo apt-get install tftpd

Next, we need to set up the file that xinetd will read when it starts tftpd.

$ sudo nano /etc/xinetd.d/tftp

Put this stuff inside it:

service tftp
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol = udp
wait = yes
user = (change this to your username)
server = /usr/sbin/in.tftpd
server_args = -s /tftpboot
per_source = 11
cps = 100 2
disable = no
}

Now, we need to make a directory that this thing will use to put/get files out of. It's commonly right in the root.

$ sudo mkdir /tftpboot

Make that directory readable/writable by your user

$ sudo chown youruser:youruser /tftpboot

$ sudo chmod -R 777 /tftpboot
(this step is required, so that new files created are able to be overwritten.)
Now things should be cooking. Let's try starting tftp.

$ sudo service xinetd restart
* Stopping internet superserver xinetd                                  [ OK ]
* Starting internet superserver xinetd                                   [ OK ] 

If things are NOT ok, then you need to check the logs. Xinetd dumps it's goodies in the syslog (/var/log/syslog). Tail that logfile (tail -f /var/log/syslog) in another console/terminal while you restart and you'll see what's going on.
In my case, I didn't have the user specified correctly, in which case xinetd just doesn't start tftpd.

Now, you should have tftpd running. Look for the open port on the machine, owned by xinetd. This process will be run by the system, so use lsof to check:

$ sudo lsof -i | grep tftp

You should get a line back like the following:
xinetd      942     root    5u  IPv4 5132137      0t0  UDP *:tftp

This means you're up and running! Try pointing something at your tftp server and see if you can get/put files. (Cisco switches, IP phones, etc)

If it fails, check the permissions of your chosen directory, and check syslog for errors. I've seen it noted that adding -v to the options in the tftp file (server_args = -v -s /tftpboot) will make it more verbose, but all I get with that is lines in syslog saying "invalid argument - ?"

Friday, August 26, 2011

Playing with Fritzing

So I've been looking at various chips to use for memory, and they all seem to be pretty much the same, so I decided to take one and start designing for it. I started playing around in Fritzing, making a simple schematic with just the micro and the SRAM to see how the software works.

Here's my schematic, autorouted by Fritzing. If I try and autoroute with that last R/W- CE line, it will crash the software. Maybe I can send that in...

This is just the 6802 Microprocessor and an Alliance Memory AS6C6264A 8Kx8Bit SRAM. Not all necessary lines are connected, the CS line goes through a decoder chip which isn't on here yet, and the power/grounds aren't wired up either.






This worked out pretty well, but I was really interested in trying out the PCB designer part, because I've tried a few before, and while they're interesting, they all have their quirks. Fritzing is no different, but there are a few little things that help. One in particular is the shift-click on bendpoints on traces.. It lines the trace bendpoint up in an intuitive way, though it does require a bit of getting used to in order to make things work the way you want. The autorouter leaves much to be desired, but it's still an alpha piece of software, so I decided to route by hand to see what I could do. Here's the result:


It's not too bad, yeah, I might not be able to fit a 16 mil trace between those pads, but I was getting a little impatient after things kept crashing and I wanted to get this blog post up. I just did a quick bit of hand-routing to make this work, which it seems to quite decently. Vias work, the way they should after you figure them out, and it's something I've been able to quickly pick up and run with.

One lesson I've come back to: Save often!

I'm going to keep going in Fritzing I think, laying out the schematic mainly and building parts I need, then I'll work on getting the traces all worked out on the schematic. I'm going to keep posting progress pictures, though this weekend will be a bit busy, going to see what I can get done.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Starting out

Okay. So for this Type 'n Talk thing to work, I need to design a schematic. Then I can lay out a board, then get it made, populate it, etc..

Decided to give Fritzing a go. It's an interesting, relatively new electronics design software that's open-source and seems fairly friendly. I don't think it has an autorouter, but that's no problem, I can lay out the traces myself; there's not too many of them on this board. I'm combining  components too, so that should reduce part count and traces even further.

So, to give you an idea of what I need to do, I need to take this schematic, and create my own with new parts that I can actually get, and make it actually work.

The first thing I decided to tackle is the ICs. I don't know what a lot of these ICs are, I've never used them before. A lot of electronics veterans may know about them from seeing or using them in the past, but I'm new to this game. What's a 2114? a 6802? a 7442? Well, they used to be some industry standard parts. Every manufacturer made their own version of them, and they would prefix them with their specific letters to denote they made it.

This gets technical. I start explaining memory storage and how these chips work. If you don't want to know about that, you can skip.

If this gets a little 'teachy', it's because I just learned this stuff. It's really cool. This explanation may help someone else who would like to understand how this memory works.

Well, the chips I started out with are 2114's. They are 1024x4 bit memory modules. Here's the 1979 datasheet.
What does that mean? In these chips, memory is organized into groups. You'll usually see this type of notation such as 1024x4, 512Mx8, etc. This is basically how many 'cells' of how many bits the memory chip can hold.

Let's take the 1024x4 as an example. This means that there are 1,024 cells of 4 bits each. Imagine your house has 1,024 rooms in a grid, like an office. Each room has 4 light switches. You can go to any room, and turn on or off the switches, in any pattern you like. This is how memory is stored. Each 'switch' is a bit, and each 'room' is a cell. So, total, since each room has 4 switches, and there are 1,024 rooms, you can have a total of 4,096  switch positions, or 'bits' of information stored.

Now, how do you tell which room to go in?
The chip has row decoders, and column decoders. Basically,  they use binary to specify which row, and which column to enable, depending on how those pins are toggled, and what binary coded numbers are produced by toggling them.
For example, if we had row pins set to 1,0 and column pins set to 0,0 that would tell the chip to look in Row 2, and Column 0, and either read or write to that spot.
Reading and writing is easy, if you want to write, you set your row and column pins to the cell or 'room' you want to write to, then set the 4 inputs to the 1 or 0 bits you want to write, and toggle the write enable line to the write position, which will write the data into those bits or 'switches'. If you want to read it back, simply set the row and column pins as before, and then leave the write enable to read position. The contents of that cell will appear on the data lines.

Ok, back to our regularly scheduled program...

So, my dilemma is that the 2114's are no longer made. They haven't been made for years, and for good reason. Memory technology has come a long, long way since then and we have faster, bigger, lower power memory chips now. 2114's were about $10 apiece when they were originally made, and you can get ten times that much memory now for the same price. Luckily though, while the newer chips can store more things, they also work the same was as the old ones!

So let's look at a new SRAM chip from a common manufacturer, Cypress Semiconductor. It's model CY7C185.
This chip has 8Kx8, or 8192x8. Looking back at how we broke down the 1024x4, this means that this chip has 8192 cells (or 'words' as they are called in the industry) of 8-bits each. This means that the new Cypress chip can hold 65,536 bits of data. That's 16 times more data than the old 2114 chip, and they only cost about $2 per chip! The new one also reads almost three times faster than the old chip, and it uses about 4 times less power!

So the issue now is how to integrate this chip. Well, there's a reason I chose a x8 chip and not a x4 chip. See, the original circuit design combined two x4 chips into a single 'x8 chip'. Since all the row and column registers are tied together in the schematic, whatever row and column the microcontroller selects, is selected on both chips. Whenever the micro flips on the chip select, both chips are on. The Write Enable lines for both chips are also tied together, so the micro can't tell which chip it's writing to, so each time it writes, it writes in 8-bit blocks. If it only wrote 4 bits, both chips would still have their write lines turned on, so one chip would write garbage while the other one wrote good data! This means that they *have* to write all 8 bits at a time.

This makes it easy. It's already writing in 8-bit blocks, so just put in a chip that will handle 8 bits for each cell, instead of two chips with 4 bits each! For the row and column selectors, being that the new chip has more memory, it also has more pins for those selectors. However, since we're only going to be using the first 1024 cells (this is all the original memory chips could address, remember?), the cells above 1024 will simply go unused. No big loss, since the memory is so cheap. We will simply tie the other ends low so they are not used when selecting rows or columns.

Here's my diagram. The top drawing shows how the memory is organized now. Notice that the D0-D7 lines are split up evenly between the two chips. This is how they combine the two smaller chips into one big 'chip'.
The bottom diagram shows an example (using a different chip than I mentioned above) of how I could integrate a larger memory chip utilizing all 8 bits at once into something much larger.



So, that's about it so far. I'm starting work in Fritzing, going to have to add my own components in and such, and I'm still researching memory options. I'll post some WIP schematics soon!

Votrax Type 'n Talk


Well, I have decided that I'm going to be building a Votrax Type 'n Talk from scratch. Well, aside from the Votrax SC-01 chip, that is.

I used to play with one of these a long time ago; my dad bought one and I would play with it at an old IBM computer, sending it text and making it say things. They're fun boxes, and they are (relatively) good at reproducing speech. They were made by a company called Votrax, which was a division of Federal Screw Works, in Detroit, MI. There's a lot more on their history on Wikipedia, so if you'd like to learn more about the company and the various products they produced, as well as how their voice synthesis works, check out that article.

The synthesizer is a basic design, uses a simple Motorola 6802 CPU with a 4K ROM and 8192 Bits of memory.
A really awesome guy has taken several Votrax products and de-potted the ROM/CPU, dumped out the ROM and completely traced out the schematic on the board. His website is here: http://www.kevtris.org/Projects/votraxtnt/index.html

Basically, my project is to take the schematic, and build a smaller, more modern version of the Type 'n Talk. Mine will have the same volume/frequency knobs, the same ROM, will operate the same way, with some improvements. Particularly, the updated version I'm building will have a USB port instead of a DB-25 serial, will do away with the baud rate switches (not necessary if I'm handling that internally) and will have a better power supply. Also, it'll have a smaller box, and more speaker outputs.
The difficult part is that the ROM has code in it that takes incoming ASCII text, interprets words into phoneme data, and feeds that into the SC-01 chip. The SC-01 is the actual Votrax chip that generates the speech from phonemes.


SO. I have the schematic, a list of parts, an SC-01, time, and the internet. LETS DO THIS.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Active Directory and BackupPC, continued...

Preface:
I originally wrote this post a long time ago. Looks like around 5/18/2011. While I never finished it, I came across it recently and think it deserves to at least be put out there to provide a bit of info that may help, rather than languishing in a draft. It may not end in a cliffhanger, but hopefully it will get you somewhere.


Well, in the continuing saga of BackupPC and Active Directory, the old BackupPC server that worked fine for so long finally died, prompting a new one.

Ok, so it didn't really die. The BackupPC box at my work has been a virtual machine (under VirtualBox in Win2k3 Server) that has had it's fair share of quirks. Yes, I'm not running VMWare or something high end, but it did the job, even though it needed to be restarted once a month or so. Mainly due to disk and network driver issues.

So, since we're getting a new server and the current one running the VM is being repurposed, I decided to pull an older P4 desktop out of the back to finally get a dedicated server running which should be MUCH more efficient and have less network/disk related issues. Obviously, this requires me to reinstall the whole mess.

I'm going to do it again this time, and do a better job of documenting it. I'll also be using the latest Ubuntu, Natty Narwhal, 32-bit Server edition, to do this. I'll walk through the steps of installing Linux, getting the machine on the domain using the newer Likewise-Open package, getting Apache up and happy with AD authentication, and then hook BackupPC into the whole mess. I'm going to have to do some interesting stuff with getting the pool over, though I may just say screw it and dump the pool since the data isn't that important. I will need to copy over the config file from the old BackupPC install though, so I don't have to spend another 5 hours configuring hostnames and excludes.

This post will be edited several times over the coming days, because it's going to take me a bit to properly do this.

Step 1: Installing Linux
The obvious first step here is to install Ubuntu on the machine. I'm using the normal Ubuntu Server 32-bit install disc from 11.04, Natty Narwhal.
The first (relevant) thing it's going to ask you is the hostname. I'm on a Big Corporate network, so as an IT Manager at a location, I only have access to do things to my location's OU. Unfortunately, when you join a computer to a domain without specifying where to put it, if there's no object, it tries to create it in the big "Computers" area, which I don't have access to. So what I do is create the computer object in my OU, and then make the hostname of the Linux box the same.
There IS a way to have Likewise-Open create in a specific OU, but I haven't played with that, and so I'm just explaining how I do it.
So, set the hostname to your created computer object's name. 

Next, you'll be asked what groups of packages to install. I choose OpenSSH (necessary to be able to SSH into the server) and Samba (for pulling data from desktops)

Step 2: Setting up Likewise-Open
The next thing to do after you get the machine up and running is to logon to it and get all the updates and such, make sure things are up to date. Then, install the Likewise-Open package.
$ sudo apt-get update
$ sudo apt-get upgrade
$ sudo apt-get install likewise-open
 The setup will ask you a question during the config of likewise-open regarding the Kerberos configuration: 
  • Default Kerberos version 5 realm This is (as the dialog explains) what the system will default to if someone tries to do a domain login as "person" rather than "domain\person". Basically, the default logon domain. This should probably be the same FQDN as the domain you're joining to.
 On my install, towards the end it says "Importing Registry Configuration", which sits there for awhile. I hit enter a couple times after a few minutes and it seems to complete; I'm not sure why it waits until enter is hit. Might be a little bug in the install script.


The Likewise-Open install guide has a few things that you need to do to prep the system for joining to the domain. I'm going to only run through a couple, but if you have issues definitely check that as it has more info on DNS and some other important things which may be already configured in Ubuntu, as the install guide is aimed at people loading the file directly onto a bare Linux system.
  • Check /etc/nsswitch.conf and make sure that the line hosts: is followed by 'files dns'. In Ubuntu 11.04, this is the default, so just double-check.
  • Make sure that /etc/resolv.conf contains nameservers that can perform SRV lookups for the domain you're trying to join. DHCP at my company already has internal nameservers in it, and provides the proper domains, so I don't have to do anything here. If you're using static IP and such, make sure that your nameserver can do SRV lookups.
  • Make sure you have your network set up correctly, i.e. primary gateway, firewall on the machine (if any), DNS lookups resolve properly to your machine name, etc. There is a laundry list of things to check on the Likewise-Open guide, definitely give it a once over before you start trying to join in case there's anything glaringly wrong. 
  • Next, we need to check the /etc/krb5.conf file to make sure it has the right domain info in it. You should see your domain listed as the default realm at the top of the file.
Step 3: Joining to the domain
This is the easy part. From the command prompt, enter the following:
 $ sudo domainjoin-cli join sub.domain.com DomainAdmin
where 'sub.domain.com' is your domain, and 'DomainAdmin' is a user that has administrative rights to join a computer.
If it works out, it should take a little while after entering the password to complete the join and do all the good configuration type stuff necessary to allow the machine to authenticate users via AD.

If successful, after it's finished you'll see a message telling you to reboot the machine or restart all services. I'm going to reboot, cause this isn't a high availability server or anything.

After the reboot, you can test the connection by attempting to logon with a domain user and password at the linux logon prompt. You should see "Created user: UserName" and it should log you on. It will even tell you if your password is about to expire!

As you can see, I've had a much easier time joining to the domain than I did previously, though most of that might just be from me not doing things correctly the first time around.

Next, we'll look at installing BackupPC and getting it working on the domain!

BackupPC: Getting that thang installed
Okay. Ubuntu server has version 3.2.0 of BackupPC, and while it's not the latest (3.2.1) there's not too much of a difference. I'm just going to use the one that comes with it for now.

$ sudo apt-get install backuppc
This will get backuppc installed. It installs x11 and a bunch of unnecessary stuff, but you just hafta kinda live with it for now. I haven't found a way to install it via APT without it.

Make sure you have Apache installed properly, it should have installed as a requisite of BackupPC. 

Now there's a couple ways to authenticate users via AD. One is via the LDAP module, which is nifty, but you need to have a user account and password that the server can use to lookup users in the domain. I don't like that, so I'm going to use Kerberos.
An interesting side-effect of Likewise-Open is that it seems to generate the keytab file for you! This makes config much easier, as we don't need to bother with a lot of stuff. You can check for the existance of it, it should be in /etc/krb5.keytab. You can also check the contents with this command:
$ sudo klist -k /etc/krb5.keytab
This will show you a list of all the bits inside it, you should see several lines listing your computer's name as well as the domain you've joined.
Now we need to make it so that Apache can read the file, as it's modules will need to see it to authenticate to the network.
$ sudo chmod 740 /etc/krb5.keytab
$ sudo chgrp www-data /etc/krb5.keytab
Now I'm not condoning this as the most secure way to do things, but I'm in somewhat of a low-security environment because I'm behind copious firewalls and such. You might want to come up with a better way to secure the keytab.

(I copied the following section from my previous post)

Now we need to edit the backuppc Apache configuration to tell Apache how to authenticate users.
The file to edit is located in /etc/apache2/conf.d/backuppc.conf
This is how my file has been setup. I have commented out the four lines at the bottom there, leaving the require valid-user line in place. I added the six lines at the top.
 
AuthType Kerberos
AuthName "Kerberos Login"
KrbAuthRealms CONTOSO.TEST.COM
Krb5Keytab /etc/krb5.keytab
KrbMethodNegotiate On
KrbMethodK5Passwd On

# AuthGroupFile /etc/backuppc/htgroup
# AuthUserFile /etc/backuppc/htpasswd
# AuthType basic
# AuthName "BackupPC admin"
require valid-user